Content

Designing Trust in AI Recommendations

Using AI to accelerate research, prototyping, and ideation during a 3-hour winning design challenge.

Role

UX Designer

Role

UX Designer

Design Team

Sarah Garrison, UX Researcher

John Murphy, Principal UX Designer

Timeline

3 hours

Timeline

3 hours

Parallax image

Content

Content

As part of an internal AI Design Challenge, our team was tasked with designing an experience that helps banking teammates understand, trust, and act on AI-generated financial recommendations.

The design prompt centered around a fictional teammate, Nora, who had received several AI-generated recommendations for a client based on banking data. The AI-generated had Nora recommend her banking client to:

  • Open a savings account

  • Apply for a cashback credit card

  • Speak with an investment advisor

The real challenge was creating confidence around these recommendations.

If a teammate couldn't answer:

  • Why was this recommendation generated?

  • What evidence supports it?

  • Can I trust this?

  • What should I say to the client?

then the recommendation had little value regardless of its accuracy.

How might we help teammates trust AI-generated recommendations enough to confidently discuss them with clients?

Our Process: Research and Design in Parallel

Our Process: Research and Design in Parallel

One of the biggest constraints was time.

The challenge required every team to conduct user research while also producing final UI designs and a working concept. With only a few hours available, my team intentionally ran research, design exploration, and prototyping in parallel rather than sequentially.

In a traditional workflow, we would:

Research → Insights → Design → Prototype

Waiting for research would leave very little time to design so we created a simultaneous workflow:

Research → AI Exploration → Initial Concepts → Insights →
Refine & Validate → Final Prototype

AI became the bridge between these activities.

How I used AI

How I used AI

One of my goals during this challenge was to use AI as an accelerator without outsourcing design judgment.

Copilot as a Strategic Thinking Partner

Immediately after receiving the challenge brief, I used Copilot to accelerate exploration.

Instead of spending large portions of our allotted time brainstorming from a blank page, I leveraged Copilot to:

  • Explore AI transparency patterns

  • Investigate trust-building approaches

  • Generate alternative interaction models

  • Evaluate different methods of surfacing supporting evidence

Copilot reduced the time required for concept generation and allowed the team to spend more time discussing tradeoffs and making informed design decisions.

Figma Make for Rapid Prototyping

As concepts emerged, I used Figma Make to help me rapidly visualize concepts and interaction patterns.

However, I rarely used generated outputs as-is. I treated Figma Make as a sketching and exploration tool:

  • Generated multiple concepts

  • Pulled elements I liked from different versions

  • Combined and remixed patterns

  • Removed complexity that didn't support the experience

As the design evolved, manually designing in Figma became more effective than continuing to iterate through prompts. The final solution was assembled by hand, informed by insights gathered through multiple AI-generated explorations.

This dramatically shortened the gap between idea and evaluation. The final output emerged from combining AI-generated ideas with design judgment and research findings.

CLI Claude Code Workflow

Once our direction became more refined, John leveraged AI-assisted CLI workflows to help transform my output into a more functional prototype. Because we had already established the information architecture, interaction patterns, and visual direction, the CLI workflow accelerated implementation rather than driving design decisions.

This enabled us to move from concept to working prototype much faster than we otherwise could have.

CLI Claude Code Workflow

Once our direction became more refined, John leveraged AI-assisted CLI workflows to help transform my output into a more functional prototype. Because we had already established the information architecture, interaction patterns, and visual direction, the CLI workflow accelerated implementation rather than driving design decisions.

This enabled us to move from concept to working prototype much faster than we otherwise could have.

Research Findings Guided Our Design Principles

Research Findings Guided Our Design Principles

Key Findings
01 Comfort Discussing Financial Products

73.8% of participants reported being familiar with discussing financial products or recommendations with clients.

02 Comfort Discussing AI Recommendations

76.3% reported feeling somewhat or very confident discussing an AI-generated recommendation with a client.

Biggest Concerns

Participants identified several trust barriers:

  • The recommendation may not fit the client's needs

  • There is insufficient context behind the recommendation

  • The recommendation could be incorrect

Most Important Information that Builds Trust

When evaluating recommendations, participants reported that confindence increased when they are able to see:

  1. The recommendation itself

  2. Why the recommendation was generated

  3. The client benefit

  4. Supporting customer data

(Research findings taken from our UserTesting survey summary.)

Design Principles

01 Explain recommendations

Explain recommendations, not just outcomes

02 Build trust through transparency

Explain recommendations, not just outcomes

03 Turn insights into action

Explain recommendations, not just outcomes

04 Provide guidance when it's needed

Explain recommendations, not just outcomes

05 Keep complexity behind the scenes

Explain recommendations, not just outcomes

The Solution

The Solution

Turning AI recommendations into confident customer conversations

We designed the experience to help teammates understand, trust, and act on AI-generated recommendations.

01 — Explain the “why”

Recommendations surface the customer signals, supporting evidence, and AI confidence behind each opportunity.

02 — Turn insight into action

Ask AI Coach helps teammates prepare for the conversation with suggested opening statements, discovery questions, and guidance for handling objections.

03 — Create a feedback loop

Teammates can provide feedback on whether a recommendation was helpful, helping improve future recommendations.

Reflection

Reflection

This challenge reinforced an important principle for me:

AI is most effective when it accelerates design thinking, not when it replaces it.

The final experience emerged through an iterative cycle of research, experimentation, synthesis, and refinement. AI helped us move faster and explore possibilities more efficiently, but human judgment, knowing what to prioritize, question, and refine, ultimately shaped the outcome.